Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hell Ya! Mac🇨🇦💪's avatar

A couple of thoughts. Lots to unpack here. I agree that digital infrastructure is an area that Canada needs to beef up. However, as we have seen both Ontario and Quebec fall into the Starlink trap, it begs the question about what sovereignty-security risks are being assessed in such procurements and subsequent contracts/purchases? Do Canadians really want to outsource that kind of power to any foreign entity? There are a lot of bad actors (toddlers) in the tech-broligarchy. Just as we must harden physical and power grid infrastructure, we must design and build digital infrastructure in Canada that is not just the “cheap” option. First to market doesn’t necessarily mean “best value”. As a former public servant who procured, negotiated, managed and dealt with several of Ontario’s large outsourced IT contracts and 3Ps ($100M -$500M), I can say from experience that these types of initiatives require a much more sophisticated risk assessment and management approach than buying pavement.

Second thought/comment: While I appreciate that critical mass for innovation will tend to favour large urban centres, decentralized planning, development and commercialization can ensure that the green/innovation economy doesn’t exacerbate rural inequality and urban affordability. For example, there are opportunities in Atlantic Canada where the academic sector has unique strengths in ocean, climate and green energy research and innovation that could be added to the Canadian “powerhouse ” list. Competitive advantages in Atlantic Canada include proximity to the EU market and large areas where affordability (compared to other Canadian urban areas) is much more within reach for a larger band of the population.

Always enjoy your articles.

Expand full comment

No posts